首页> 外文OA文献 >A Bottom-Up, Non-Cooperative Approach to Climate Change Control: Assessment and Comparison of Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs)
【2h】

A Bottom-Up, Non-Cooperative Approach to Climate Change Control: Assessment and Comparison of Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs)

机译:自下而上的非合作方式控制气候变化:国家自主贡献的评估和比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

International negotiations on climate change control are moving away from a global cooperative agreement (at least from the ambition to achieve it) to adopt a bottom-up framework composed of unilateral pledges of domestic measures and policies. This shift from cooperative to voluntary actions to control GHG emissions already started in Copenhagen at COP 15 in 2007 and became a platform formally adopted by a large number of countries in Paris at COP 21. The new architecture calls for a mechanism to review the nationally determined contributions (NDCs) of the various signatories and assess their adequacy. Most importantly, countries’ voluntary pledges need to be compared to assess the fairness, and not only the effectiveness, of the resulting outcome. This assessment is crucial to support future, more ambitious, commitments to reduce GHG emissions. It is therefore important to identify criteria and quantitative indicators to assess and compare the NDCs.
机译:关于气候变化控制的国际谈判正在从一项全球合作协议(至少是实现这一目标的雄心)转变为采用一种由国内措施和政策的单方面承诺组成的自下而上的框架。从合作到自愿的控制温室气体排放的转变已于2007年在哥本哈根的COP15大会上开始,并已成为巴黎许多国家在COP21上正式采用的平台。新架构要求建立一种机制,以审查由国家决定的各个签署方的捐款(NDC)并评估其适当性。最重要的是,需要将国家的自愿承诺进行比较,以评估结果的公平性,而不仅仅是有效性。这项评估对于支持未来减少温室气体排放的雄心勃勃的承诺至关重要。因此,重要的是确定标准和定量指标,以评估和比较国家数据中心。

著录项

  • 作者

    Carraro, Carlo;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号